The performing arts have been a vital channel to express human emotions, highlight social concerns, and build cultural narratives since the dawn of civilisation. From theatre performances to street plays, music concerts, and dance recitals, the creative arts have always embodied the spirit of freedom.
However, Delhi’s newly introduced performance licensing regime raises serious concerns regarding the fundamental rights of artists, particularly their freedom of speech and expression guaranteed under Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution. It imposes a threat to the very essence of artistic freedom by imposing restrictions and hurdles that could stifle creativity in the capital city. Let’s examine how this system poses a threat society’s creative fabric, and how it stands in contrast to our cherished fundamental freedoms.
The Evolution of the Licensing Regime in Delhi:
Delhi has long been a vibrant centre for diverse cultural performances at every level, with venues ranging from bustling streets to iconic auditoriums. Historically, the licensing process, which addressed basic safety and public order concerns, was straightforward, allowing performers to earn their livelihoods with minimal intervention from the authorities. However, the introduction of the new licensing framework has significantly altered the landscape.
Under the Delhi Police Act and various guidelines under the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, artists now face a multifaceted approval process requiring clearances from multiple government bodies, including the police, fire safety department, local authorities, and even the District Magistrate’s office in some cases. These rules are framed under provisions that govern public order and safety, but their sweeping nature raises questions about their necessity and proportionality. For instance, the need for police verification for low-risk performances such as street plays introduces an element of state control over what may or may not be performed, veiled under the guise of maintaining public safety.
A Barrier to Artistic Expression:
One of the most significant challenges posed by this licensing regime is the increased cost and complexity of the approval process. Artists now must secure multiple clearances before any performance can take place, even for small, community-driven events. The additional financial and emotional burdens associated with these approvals can delay or even derail artistic endeavours, as independent artists and small theatre groups, who usually operate with limited budgets, often find it difficult to afford the additional costs.
In particular, the Delhi Police Act empowers authorities to deny performance licenses on the grounds of maintaining public order, decency, and morality, as per Article 19(2) of the Constitution. However, these broad justifications can easily be misused to suppress dissent or controversial art forms. The ability to grant or deny a license now lies squarely in the hands of governmental authorities, which creates a potential avenue for bias or arbitrary decisions, that could silence performances critiquing the state or challenging widely accepted social norms.
Licensing Places of Public Amusement: The New Hurdles
Delhi’s new guidelines also include stricter controls on licensing places of public amusement under Section 143 of the Delhi Police Act. Any establishment or venue intending to host public performances must now obtain specific permissions, even if said performances are artistic and pose no real threat to public order or safety. While safety regulations are essential, the process has become so onerous that it effectively discourages smaller venues from supporting independent or experimental art.
The Public Amusement Performance Regulations introduced by the Delhi government impose further restrictions. The act now demands that all performances be vetted through multiple government agencies to ensure compliance with decency and morality standards—a move that arguably crosses the line into censorship. This is particularly troubling given the essential role of the performing arts in questioning social conventions and encouraging public discourse.
Freedom of Expression Versus State Control:
The heart of the issue is the growing tension between artistic freedom and state control. Article 19(1)(a) of the Indian Constitution enshrines freedom of speech and expression as a fundamental right, with reasonable restrictions laid out in Article 19(2). These restrictions, however, are meant to be applied only in the interest of the sovereignty and integrity of the nation, public order, decency, or morality, among other factors.
The broad discretion granted to authorities under the new licensing regime runs the risk of turning these reasonable restrictions into convenient tools to suppress creative expression. Drama, music, and dance—forms that often serve as vehicles for political or social commentary—may be denied licenses based on subjective interpretations of public order or morality.
Additionally, there is a risk that artists may be compelled to self-censor. In an environment where obtaining a license has become fraught with potential hurdles, many may choose to modify their performances to ensure approval. This kind of self-regulation compromises the integrity of the art itself, leading to a sanitised cultural landscape devoid of genuine critique or dissent.
A Call for Change: The Need for a Balanced Approach
While ensuring public safety is undoubtedly important, the licensing regime in Delhi must strike a balance between regulation and artistic freedom. The current framework places too much emphasis on control at the expense of creativity. Policymakers need to engage in a dialogue with the artistic community to better understand the challenges they face and to create a regulatory environment that fosters creativity while ensuring safety.
One potential solution could be to tailor the approval process based on the scale and nature of the performance. Small, low-risk performances could be subject to a simpler, faster licensing process, while larger events with higher public safety concerns could undergo more rigorous scrutiny. This would ensure that regulation is proportionate and does not unnecessarily hinder artistic expression.
Conclusion:
Delhi’s new performance licensing regime poses a significant threat to the fundamental rights of artists. By imposing excessive hurdles, the state risks undermining the creative freedom that is essential to a vibrant and democratic society. If India is to remain a nation that values free speech and expression, it is imperative that we protect the rights of artists to perform.
The government must re-evaluate the licensing regime to ensure that it aligns with the constitutional principles of free expression and artistic freedom. If left unchecked, this regime could lead to a cultural environment where only safe, state-sanctioned performances are allowed, diminishing the richness and diversity of India’s artistic traditions. Art, after all, is not just entertainment – it is the soul of society, reflecting its complexities, joys, struggles, and aspirations. We must ensure that it continues to thrive, unburdened by unnecessary restrictions.
Leave a Reply